List of Figures and Tables
The figures and tables of this book, in order. Each links to where it appears. Every figure, rendered in full with its caption, also lives on the Figures Gallery — a one-page visual review of the whole book.
Figures
- Figure 0.1-1 — The book's argument
- Figure 0.3-1 — The MAGE method
- Figure 0.4-1 — The six model classes, organized by the engineering questions they answer
- Figure 0.4-2 — The agent stack and a characteristic failure mode
- Figure 0.4-3 — The governed environment
- Figure 0.5-1 — From case to theory
- Figure 1.1-1 — Where engineering leverage acts
- Figure 1.2-1 — DocAble from the user's view
- Figure 1.2-2 — Processing one document in DocAble
- Figure 1.3-1 — Agentic machinery and environment
- Figure 1.3-2 — The reasoning horizon
- Figure 1.4-1 — From substrate to method
- Figure 2.1-1 — Obligations bound a realization space without selecting one realization
- Figure 2.1-2 — Obligation, scaffolding, and degrees of freedom
- Figure 2.1-3 — From engineering question to engineering consequence
- Figure 2.1-4 — The engineering modeling repertoire
- Figure 2.2-1 — The structural move
- Figure 2.2-2 — Document-mutation structural model
- Figure 2.2-3 — From computations to composition
- Figure 2.3-1 — The behavioral move
- Figure 2.3-2 — Recovery-ordering model
- Figure 2.3-3 — Behavioral models expose different classes of properties
- Figure 2.3-4 — In-flight ownership model
- Figure 2.3-5 — Model classes overlap
- Figure 2.4-1 — The decision move
- Figure 2.4-2 — Service-flow model
- Figure 2.4-3 — Observation and intent answer different questions
- Figure 2.4-4 — The upload-entitlement domain
- Figure 2.4-5 — One distinction, lost and preserved
- Figure 2.5-1 — Heterogeneous models over shared identities
- Figure 2.5-2 — Attribution provenance model
- Figure 2.5-3 — Computation structure versus realized history
- Figure 2.5-4 — Task-driven traversal
- Figure 2.5-5 — Three correspondence patterns
- Figure 2.5-6 — Coverage of model correspondence
- Figure 2.5-7 — Checked predicates over a structured model
- Figure 2.5-8 — Modeling and enforcement are separate decisions
- Figure 3.0-1 — How intent becomes enforceable
- Figure 3.1-1 — Intervention boundaries
- Figure 3.2-1 — Three distinct relations
- Figure 3.2-2 — Correspondence strength and governing role are independent
- Figure 3.2-3 — The semantic gap
- Figure 3.3-1 — Constraint or sensor
- Figure 3.3-2 — Match the mechanism to the property
- Figure 3.3-3 — One Measurement, Different Enforcement Decisions
- Figure 3.3-4 — Negative and positive constraints
- Figure 3.3-5 — Provenance-carried admission
- Figure 3.4-1 — Governance conversion
- Figure 3.4-2 — Correct judgment without enforcement
- Figure 3.4-3 — Where enforcement stops
- Figure 3.5-1 — The conflict is the edge
- Figure 3.5-2 — Three views of the control machinery
- Figure 4.1-1 — Engineer–agent interaction through Modeling and Alignment
- Figure 4.1-2 — Active and passive alignment
- Figure 4.1-3 — Incrementally extending the alignment kernel
- Figure 4.2-1 — Two execution units for document remediation
- Figure 4.2-2 — Chunked residency versus skeletonized residency
- Figure 4.2-3 — Two execution policies over the same remediation graph
- Figure 4.2-4 — Analysis before implementation
- Figure 4.2-5 — The GenAI dependency chain and its latency floor
- Figure 4.2-6 — Using prediction error as evidence
- Figure 4.2-7 — Modeling as a loop
- Figure 4.3-1 — Discovering latent models — weak signals → partition {legitimate shape · mechanical debt · latent concept} → name the model → migrate consumers → narrower enforcement → stronger substrate
- Figure 4.3-2 — Audit, Drain, Promote
- Figure 4.4-1 — Engineering recurring work
- Figure 4.4-2 — Two evidence boundaries — earliest legible boundary catches cheaply near the cause; last safe boundary re-establishes what must hold
- Figure 5.1-1 — Two problems of factory engineering — process design organizes production around the fabricator; tolerance bounds the product and measurement establishes whether a realization falls inside those bounds
- Figure 5.2-1 — The Seven Build Stages
- Figure 5.2-2 — Realization Over Time
- Figure 5.2-3 — Work Over Time
- Figure 5.2-4 — The Controls Accumulate
- Figure 5.2-5 — Factory Capital and the Support Ratio, Weekly
- Figure 5.2-6 — The Model Census
- Figure 5.2-7 — The modeling history
- Figure 5.2-8 — The Admission Funnel, One Mature Week
- Figure 5.2-9 — What Experience Became
- Figure 5.2-10 — Modeled and Observed, Not Yet Binding
- Figure 5.2-11 — The Delegation Staircase
- Figure 5.2-12 — Weekly Commit Provenance as a Delegation Proxy
- Figure 5.3-1 — Seven Entry Points
- Figure 6.1-1 — The MAGE Dynamic Model
- Figure 6.1-2 — Probability in the software factory — the encode, interpret and realize steps of the production path, and the encoded property forking into the tolerance the realization is evaluated against
- Figure 6.1-3 — The Determinization Frontier
- Figure 6.3-1 — The economics of explicit engineering
- Figure 7.1-1 — Where Engineering Effort Moves
- Figure 7.2-1 — Why software modeled differently
- Figure 7.2-2 — Established traditions, new composition
- Figure 7.3-1 — Governing consequential work
- Figure A-1 — Seven reference engineering stacks and their common relationships
- Figure A.1-1 — The model-coherence composition
- Figure A.2-1 — The assurance composition
- Figure A.3-1 — The auditable-transformation composition
- Figure A.4-1 — The observe → react composition
- Figure A.5-1 — The resource-mediation composition
- Figure A.6-1 — The governance-conversion composition, a loop
- Figure A.7-1 — The context-delivery composition
- Figure A.8-1 — Composing an engineering stack
- Figure B-1 — Ten recurring engineering problems and the moves that address them
- Figure B.1-1 — One authoritative representation
- Figure B.2-1 — Query, don't snapshot
- Figure B.3-1 — Correspondence runs both ways
- Figure B.4-1 — Required set minus present evidence
- Figure B.5-1 — Earliest legible, last safe
- Figure B.6-1 — Open surface versus closed seam
- Figure B.7-1 — Knowledge delivery at the decision point
- Figure B.8-1 — Cause travels with consequence
- Figure B.9-1 — From system model to operational guidance
- Figure B.10-1 — Impact as a graph query
- Figure C-1 — The executable-model pattern
- Figure C.1-1 — Structure and boundaries
- Figure C.2-1 — Behavior plus ownership
- Figure C.3-1 — Stable topology, variable execution policy
- Figure C.4-1 — Measurement does not imply enforcement
- Figure C.5-1 — Facts before prose
- Figure C.6-1 — Composition by reference
- Figure D.9-1 — Brownfield progress
- Figure E.2-1 — Three complementary skills act around one governed engineering environment
- Figure F.1-1 — MAGE across the product lifecycle
- Figure F.4-1 — Change-scoped models, degrees of freedom, and inheritance
- Figure F.5-1 — From incident repair to governance conversion
- Figure F.6-1 — Assurance across models and realization
- Figure F.8-1 — From local MAGE adoption to the product GEE
- Figure F.9-1 — Engineering capital across time and space
- Figure G.1-1 — From assistance to bounded delegation
- Figure G.2-1 — From recurring cost to engineering capital
- Figure G.2-2 — Four figures this appendix puts to work
- Figure H-1 — Cloudflare projected onto MAGE
- Figure H-2 — Spotify projected onto MAGE
- Figure H-3 — Shopify projected onto MAGE
- Figure H-4 — Siemens projected onto MAGE
- Figure H-5 — Zenseact projected onto MAGE
- Figure H-6 — Uber projected onto MAGE
- Figure I-1 — Weekly Commit Volume
- Figure I-2 — Product-Path Line Motion
- Figure J.2-1 — Model induction
Tables
- Table 1.2-1 — The DocAble requirements
- Table 2.1-1 — Degrees of semantic commitment, in concrete artifacts
- Table 5.2-1 — The DocAble requirements, repeated
- Table 5.2-2 — Census specimens and their supervisory consequences
- Table 5.2-3 — The factory's observed construction and operating cost
- Table 5.2-4 — The remediation task at four scales
- Table 5.3-1 — Two dimensions of the agentic software factory
- Table 6.1-1 — Mapping the software factory into the theory
- Table 6.1-2 — The three MAGE outcomes and their observables
- Table 6.1-3 — The four Modeling × Alignment combinations
- Table 6.2-1 — MAGE's nine hypotheses in three families
- Table 6.3-1 — Typical MAGE profiles by setting
- Table 7.1-1 — How technological progress can redirect engineering effort
- Table 7.4-1 — The authorship division
- Table C.1-1 — Component-zone properties
- Table C.2-1 — Lifecycle invariants
- Table C.7-1 — Representation to enforcement receipt
- Table D.1-1 — The Operator's Dashboard — five primary readings
- Table D.8-1 — Joining the wiki to the code
- Table D.8-2 — Audit, synchronize, govern, extend
- Table Colophon-1 — The manuscript's governing models and the failures they prevent
© James C. Davis, 2026–present